空置稅


波叔就話可能會推空置稅,好多淡淡就即刻跳出黎又話大力支持咁,然後當然個論據就係發展商呢而家就有所謂9500個未賣的單位咁話,因此空置稅一方面可以打擊發展商盡快以平價散貨,唔好囤積居奇咁样啦,而亦有好多住宅單位呢,就會可能之前一個人炒幾間,而家就又掟番出個市場咁,形成一股可以壓樓價的政策咁話。


不過要講空置稅,首先就一定要講點样去徵稅先,因為大家要明白,發展商同埋社會大眾呢,都係好識得跟住遊戲規則玩的人,尤其係發展商,你要黎搞我,正所謂上有國策就下有對策架啦。因此呢,以最傳統的空置稅黎講,一般計空置就係睇下個單位有無用電咁样啦,而如果係統計學呢,就會去到用數燈呢一招,比如係一段時間內搵幾個大廈屋苑去日日數,睇下邊個單位無著燈就空置。


好啦,如果以二手樓黎講呢,其實如果真係要對應就好易啦,你可以選擇去平租比你屋企人,比如你老豆老母咁話,然後自己人D錢咪自己諗番清楚囉。又或者,你計我用電,我咪著住一兩盞燈囉,每個月交番三兩舊水電費,就以上述兩招,就可以輕易咁解決左空置問題,咁點抽稅呢?當然,以上都係權宜之計,最好的就係搵到個租客租啦,但如果都可以破到空置,咁又點會劈平租比街客呢?


而家當然社會的矛頭亦其實係指向發展商啦,始終你發展商係無樓人仕的假想敵,所以政府抽你稅就算樓價唔冧啊,我相信都有一班人會心涼,正所謂我過得唔好,你都要一样咁仆街的攬炒心態嘛。之但係,發展商所謂的貨尾又點样搞作呢?


其實9500個貨尾,就當足你9500個貨尾啦都唔去考究有幾多未必係valid的數字,而要成為呢個貨尾呢,理應就係當攞左預售樓花通知書開始計吧,咁亦即係話如果唔申請預售樓花通知書住,咁就唔駛徵稅啦Right?好啦,所以呢發展商呢D友仔唔會傻的,係,佢地會好可能好合作咁將呢9500個單位出售或出租,但9500個係一年內係絕對吸收到,賣唔出的應該可能係某D特色單位好蝦人買的,咪攞去放租或最差咪做員工宿舍囉,當然都要計一計數就係你個稅係幾錢同埋追溯期係幾時啦。


好啦,搞掂呢9500個單位名花有主之後就入戲肉啦,點解呢?咁老實講,如果你做生意整的產品出黎係有限時間賣唔出,咁你會點啊?屌好簡單姐,咪減慢個生產去到一定賣得出的數量,甚至避險咪直情唔生產囉,唔生產唔駛輸喎,咁即係我只要有限度生產,以前我一年起3000個單位,而家呢,起1000個算啦,唔係一間賣唔出中伏咪仆街,其他的樓都可能起住先,但拖慢進度囉,賣到1000個先再申請預售吧。好啦,拖慢左進度即係一年個turnover少左,咁要追數又點啊?反正都唧牙膏,惜售啦,賣貴D啦,反正個個行家都係唔敢狂賣。


拉長黎睇又會係咩情況呢,出唔到貨,自然,咪唔會起住囉,將D地晒太陽囉。好啦如果你咁串連地都搞,咪連地都唔買囉,咁結果只會得一個,就係發展商大減供應,而如果減供應,樓價會點啊?升得咪仲急。睇到呢到,有樓的你會點啊?笑囉。真心唔明,點解淡友會支持?


不過大家唔駛驚,空置稅呢家野好難過,因為地產商有票,鄉親又有票,而有票的人大部份都應該有物業有樓,少左新樓,後面果個瘋狂大的利益集團,包括銀行建築測量之類相關的人,全部都會受影響,想出空置稅應該好難,所以唔出咪繼續Party,出左,都真心唔驚,因為要升的始終都係要升,呢個係呢個QE年代下的悲歌,無計。




留言

  1. NO, it can be property holding tax for residential property... any company or person have more one property , the 2nd one will start to pay this property holding tax, 2nd one tax say 2%. 3rd one 2% x 3 , 4th one 2% x 4% of Market valuated price or last traded price of the simular property...

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 張建宗司長都有9間呀老友
      先用COMMON SENSE諗下個可行性吧
      仲有用公司HOLD 又點計?會做成唔平均的TAXATION
      同埋徵稅的BASIS 係有困難, 做得JR 後我估都10年

      刪除
    2. 我忍住無覆, 多謝你將最基本的概念指出 :)

      刪除
    3. 徵稅的BASIS Government Rent and Rates always evaluate the latest rental value so it is easy to reverse calculate the Property Value = annual rental / rate of return (~4%)...

      刪除
    4. 此留言已被作者移除。

      刪除
    5. for each HKID {
      n = count of property
      r = standard tax x 2^(n-1)
      tax to be paid = Sum (r x Property value)
      }
      nothing can be more simple than the above...

      刪除
    6. Capital gain tax cannot have any effect if the large landlord does not sell their property at all..

      空置稅 need a lot of manual effort to check if it is empty or not

      my method allows people to hold some property (4 at most, husband, wife, two child total 4 head count) and prevent the concentrate of property into just a few people...

      according to HK Gov data, top ten holds so much units!!
      16-17 稅務年度,獲最多寬减差餉的頭十個人/公司,共擁有39,865個單位,共獲寬免1.24億的差餉,平均每個單位獲寬減3115元。那年四季差餉全部每季寬減上限為1000元。

      來年(18-19)四季每季寬減上限提升至2500元。假設其餘基數不變,當平均每個單位獲寬減6000元(保守估計,可能更多),這十人/公司可共獲寬減2.39億的差餉。

      刪除
    7. To prevent people create one company to own only one property, we can just apply higher tax rate at company level (special company holding tax 50 times of standard tax rate) to prevent people to use company as the tools for holding property...

      property developer companies (if not sell the flat after completion for say 1 year) also subject to such special company holding tax and also tax rate x 2 ^(n-1)

      this will force them to sell the property as fast possible

      if they decide to slow down the land development, gov can have the condition that if the residential is not completed within particular time (say 4-5 years), the land need to be returned to Gov without compensation...

      刪除
    8. 其實呀老友你有無諗緊點解政府會咁做? 目的為左壓低樓價, 令到香港最有錢個一班人反枱D7佢?
      資本主義的本質,有血有肉咁講, 就係兩個字"剝削"
      老細剝削打工仔, 強積金對沖政府有做過什麼?

      無利益的前提下, 點解政府要咁做?
      退後一萬步, 香港有今日的成功, 主因係"自由市場", 3D已經拆左香港半個招牌
      你如果係特首, 問下自己會唔會咁做?

      刪除
  2. holding 100 property means 2% x 100 of the market value of the property ....

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. this is simple and IRD has all information ....

      刪除
    2. Goodest method, why not execute all ppl having more than one property?

      刪除
    3. 學DISCUSS話齋, 有樓拎去打靶
      然而最諷刺係, 個班講的人又係想樓價跌左又上番車跟住又係GOGOGO

      刪除

發佈留言

此網誌的熱門文章

被退休的CEO

DSE題三: 專精一事還是多元人生

大圍車位的潛力